ERP, or Enterprise Resource Planning is an integrated computer system designed to manage all the existing resources inside a company including but not limited to financial resources, human resources, inventory and assets, etc. Usually an ERP system uses a centralized database, but recently, with the increased popularity of cloud services, the systems tend to become distributed.
Introduction:
As companies increased in size, and started to manipulate an increase number of entities (human, financial, inventory) it was obvious that a system was needed in place to manage them. Beside management, a complex decisional system was also needed that would manage various administrative workflows that are part of day to day operations.
Design:
ERP Providers usually implement standard business processes based on best operating practices. Depending on the company size, the company itself has to adhere to the business processes already modeled in the existing ERP packages, or, in the case of big corporations, it is usually the other way around, with new ERP packages build from scratch or adapted to adhere to the business processes already in use.
The main components that are part of a standard ERP package are:
Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
Human Resources Management
Project Management
Finance and Accounting
Manufacturing Production, Service and Delivery management
Supply Chain and Vendor Management
Warehouse and Inventory Management
Not all the possible modules are listed here and no ERP deployment is the same. A company does not necessarily needs Manufacturing Management Module, if it is in the Service business, etc.
Pros:
Unified system tracking various corporate entities from creation to consumption (ex. order tracking from acceptance through fulfillment, product manufacturing from design to shipment, project management from definition to completion and release or ever human resource from hiring campaign through hiring, promotion/demotion and termination)
data centralization – eliminates redundancies and facilitate backup and data mining procedures
structured data shaping, access and visualization – allow data access based on roles and offers views limited by scope
optimizes inventory by providing sales analysis
optimizes marketing campaigns by tracking customers and sales
Cons:
Cost – ERP packages tend to be expensive and, due to the inherent complexity of both the software itself and the multitude of existing business processes already existent in a company, the time to deployment can take years
When a company replaces its internal process with the ones modeled by the ERP package, it may result in a loss of performance
additional time is needed to familiarize all employee with the new system and the end results might not be optimal
insufficient initial funding might result in transition failure
April 15th, 2010 | Tags: advantages, benefits, cons, disadvantages, ERp System, implementation,pro, What is | Category: Editorials | Leave a comment
ERP Vendors
You can find most well known ERP Providers in the following list. Help us to keep the list updated by sending us information about related companies currently not listed.
Company Name
Package Name
Comments
SAP
SAP Business Suite, SAP Business ByDesignb, SAP Business One, SAP Business All-in-One
Oracle
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, Oracle e-Business Suite, PeopleSoft
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics (AX, NAV, GP, SL)
NetSuite
NetSuite
CDC Software
Epicor
Epicor Enterprise
Syspro
SYSPRO
Plex Systems
Plex Online
Infor Global Solutions
ERP Adage, ERP LN, ERP LX, ERP SL, ERP Swan, ERP SX.Enterprise, ERP VE, ERP XA
The Sage Group
Sage ACCPPAC, Sage Pro ERP, Sage ERP X3
Lawson Software
Lawson M3, Lawson S3
IBM
Maximo (MRO)
QAD
QAD Enterprise Applications
Comarch
Comarch Altum
COA Solutions Ltd
Smart Business Suite
ABAS Software
ABAS ERP
PointHR
PointHR ATS, NEON
Showing posts with label Professional Employer Organization (PEO). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Professional Employer Organization (PEO). Show all posts
Monday, 25 July 2011
Sunday, 21 March 2010
Key Provisions of the New Health Care Law
Anyway, to HR people here are the key points, until SHRM's people can do a better analysis:
- Almost every individual will be required to get health insurance.
- If you employee 50 or more people, and the government is forced to subsidize your employees, you will be forced to pay a penalty of $2000 per employee per year.
- Denial for pre-existing conditions is going away
- Insurance exchanges with minimum standard coverages will be set up.
- Dependents can stay on their parent's plans up to age 26.
-Editor
(The following is from Reuters)
Democrats, who have a majority in Congress, were taking a two-step process. The House was set to vote on approving the version of the healthcare legislation passed by the Senate in December. If the House passes it, that would give it final congressional approval and President Barack Obama could sign it into law.
The House also was set to vote separately on a series of proposed changes to the Senate-passed measure. If these changes win House approval, they would then go back to the Senate for senators to approve before the changes then also could be signed into law by Obama.
Here are key provisions of the Senate-passed legislation and the proposed changes.
INSURANCE MARKET REFORM
The legislation would require substantial insurance market reforms that would bar insurers from excluding people for pre-existing medical conditions and prevent them from arbitrarily dropping policy holders.
Insurance exchanges would be created in which small businesses and individuals without employer-sponsored coverage would be able to shop for coverage. Plans offered on the exchange would have to meet minimum benefit requirements.
The proposed changes would allow dependent children to remain on their parents' health policies until age 26.
The Senate bill requires insurers to spend at least 85 cents of every premium dollar on medical care in small group markets and 80 cents in large group markets. The proposed changes also would require Medicare Advantage insurers to spend at least 85 percent of revenues on medical care.
COVERAGE MANDATES, SUBSIDIES AND MEDICAID
Individuals would be required to obtain health insurance. Those who fail to obtain coverage would face fines of up to 2.5 percent of income by 2016.
Firms with more than 50 workers who do not offer medical coverage could face fines of $2,000 per full-time employee.
Federal subsidies would be provided to help people with incomes up to 400 percent of the poverty level purchase coverage on the exchange. Proposed changes would sweeten those subsidies for lower income people.
Medicaid, the government health insurance program for the poor, would be available to everyone with incomes up to 133 percent of the poverty level, which stood at $10,830 for an individual and $22,050, for a family of four. Many states have eligibility requirements below those levels.
The proposed changes would get rid of a special deal in the Senate bill that would have provided more money to Nebraska to cover costs of increased Medicaid coverage.
FINANCING
The final proposal makes some adjustments to the revenue measures in the Senate-passed bill.
The Senate bill included a 40 percent excise tax on high-cost health insurance plans. The proposed changes would delay implementation of the tax until 2018 instead of 2013. The tax would kick in on plans costing $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for family coverage. A higher threshold is allowed for plans covering mostly women, older workers and retirees as well as those in high-risk professions.
The bill calls for raising the payroll taxes for Medicare, the government health insurance plan for the elderly and disabled, to 2.35 percent from the current 1.45 percent for individuals earning $200,000 or more and for couples earning $250,000 or more. The proposed changes would apply the tax to some investment income as well for those high-income groups.
The bill imposes fees on medical device manufacturers, insurance providers and brand-name pharmaceuticals. The proposed changes would delay implementation of those fees.
It also puts a 10 percent tax on indoor tanning services that use ultraviolet lamps goes into effect on July 1.
MEDICARE
The legislation would freeze payments to insurers that provide coverage to Medicare patients in 2011 and begin reducing the subsidy in 2012.
It would also gradually close the gap in drug coverage for Medicare beneficiaries by 2020. Those who enter the coverage gap, the so-called doughnut hole, in 2010 will get a $250 rebate. In 2011 they would get a 50 percent discount on brand-name drugs.
(Reporting by Donna Smith; Editing by Deborah Charles)
-The Rest @ Reuters
Washington Post's take
-- Congressional Democrats have released a final version of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul bill in advance of a House vote planned for Sunday. Some features of the legislation, which makes changes to the bill the Senate passed on Christmas Eve:
COST: $940 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
HOW MANY COVERED: 32 million uninsured. Major coverage expansion begins in 2014. When fully phased in, 95 percent of eligible Americans would have coverage, compared with 83 percent today.
INSURANCE MANDATE: Almost everyone is required to be insured or else pay a fine. There is an exemption for low-income people. Mandate takes effect in 2014.
INSURANCE MARKET REFORMS: Starting this year, insurers would be forbidden from placing lifetime dollar limits on policies, from denying coverage to children because of pre-existing conditions, and from canceling policies because someone gets sick. Parents would be able to keep older kids on their coverage up to age 26. A new high-risk pool would offer coverage to uninsured people with medical problems until 2014, when the coverage expansion goes into high gear. Major consumer safeguards would also take effect in 2014. Insurers would be prohibited from denying coverage to people with medical problems or charging them more. Insurers could not charge women more.
MEDICAID: Expands the federal-state Medicaid insurance program for the poor to cover people with incomes up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level, $29,327 a year for a family of four. Childless adults would be covered for the first time, starting in 2014. The federal government would pay 100 percent of costs for covering newly eligible individuals through 2016. A special deal that would have given Nebraska 100 percent federal financing for newly eligible Medicaid recipients in perpetuity is eliminated. A different, one-time deal negotiated by Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu for her state, Louisiana, worth as much as $300 million, remains.
TAXES: Dramatically scales back a Senate-passed tax on high-cost insurance plans that was opposed by House Democrats and labor unions. The tax would be delayed until 2018, and the thresholds at which it is imposed would be $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for families. To make up for the lost revenue, the bill applies an increased Medicare payroll tax to the investment income and to the wages of individuals making more than $200,000, or married couples above $250,000. The tax on investment income would be 3.8 percent.
PRESCRIPTION DRUGS: Gradually closes the "doughnut hole" coverage gap in the Medicare prescription drug benefit that seniors fall into once they have spent $2,830. Seniors who hit the gap this year will receive a $250 rebate. Beginning in 2011, seniors in the gap receive a discount on brand name drugs, initially 50 percent off. When the gap is completely eliminated in 2020, seniors will still be responsible for 25 percent of the cost of their medications until Medicare's catastrophic coverage kicks in.
EMPLOYER RESPONSIBILITY: As in the Senate bill, businesses are not required to offer coverage. Instead, employers are hit with a fee if the government subsidizes their workers' coverage. The $2,000-per-employee fee would be assessed on the company's entire work force, minus an allowance. Companies with 50 or fewer workers are exempt from the requirement. Part-time workers are included in the calculations, counting two part-timers as one full-time worker.
SUBSIDIES: The proposal provides more generous tax credits for purchasing insurance than the original Senate bill did. The aid is available on a sliding scale for households making up to four times the federal poverty level, $88,200 for a family of four. Premiums for a family of four making $44,000 would be capped at around 6 percent of income.
HOW YOU CHOOSE YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE: Small businesses, the self-employed and the uninsured could pick a plan offered through new state-based purchasing pools called exchanges, opening for business in 2014. The exchanges would offer the same kind of purchasing power that employees of big companies benefit from. People working for medium-to-large firms would not see major changes. But if they lose their jobs or strike out on their own, they may be eligible for subsidized coverage through the exchange.
GOVERNMENT-RUN PLAN: No government-run insurance plan. People purchasing coverage through the new insurance exchanges would have the option of signing up for national plans overseen by the federal office that manages the health plans available to members of Congress. Those plans would be private, but one would have to be nonprofit.
ABORTION: The proposal keeps the abortion provision in the Senate bill. Abortion opponents disagree on whether restrictions on taxpayer funding go far enough. The bill tries to maintain a strict separation between taxpayer dollars and private premiums that would pay for abortion coverage. No health plan would be required to offer coverage for abortion. In plans that do cover abortion, policyholders would have to pay for it separately, and that money would have to be kept in a separate account from taxpayer money. States could ban abortion coverage in plans offered through the exchange. Exceptions would be made for cases of rape, incest and danger to the life of the mother.
GOP HEALTH CARE SUMMIT IDEAS: Following a bipartisan health care summit last month, Obama announced he was open to incorporating several Republican ideas into his legislation. But two of the principle ones - hiring investigators to pose as patients and search for fraud at hospitals and increasing spending for medical malpractice reform initiatives - did not make it into the legislation released Thursday. The legislation incorporates only one, an increase in payments to primary care physicians under Medicaid, an idea mentioned by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.
The Rest @ The Washington Post
On Twitter
Sunday, 31 January 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)